This is a systematic review looking at shock absorbing insoles, and CFO and PFO- though NOT comparing the FO's against each other. The key take home point is that BOTH the CFO and PFO interventions reduced the incidence of bone and stress-reaction forms of injury, but NOT, soft tissue injury such as tendinopathy. Both forms of orthoses performed better than the shock absorbing insole.
Related Articles
Other Studies
:format(webp))
Sedentary Behaviour and Cardiovascular Risk: Why Movement Matters More Than Ever
New study links sedentary time to heart failure and mortality: Movement really matters.
:format(webp))
Orthoses vs. Insoles: Pressure & Impact in Military Boots
Contoured insoles reduce heel pressure, boost midfoot load, and lower tibial acceleration.
:format(webp))
Foot orthoses for people with rheumatoid arthritis: a survey of prescription habits among podiatrists
Foot Orthoses for people with rheumatoid arthritis-a survey of prescription habits among...
Want to Download the Full Article?
Fill out this quick form to download the full article.